P
r a c t i c e U p d a t e - September 2008
Please read this update and contact this office if you have any queries
ATO's Compliance Program: 2008/09
The Tax
Commissioner, Michael D’Ascenzo, has released the ATO's Compliance program
for 2008/09, which lets the community know where they will focus their
attention and the action they will take in the coming
year, "so
people know which areas of risk they should avoid".
The ATO will focus on (among other things):
- income tax;
- tax
havens;
- dodgy
tax schemes;
- wealthy
individuals; and
- the
cash economy.
Their priorities for individual taxpayers include:
- a focus on capital gains from the sale of property, shares and other
assets;
- expanding
their review of the activities of senior executives and directors;
and
- monitoring
work-related expense claims, particularly out-of-pattern claims for
selfeducation, car and travel expenses.
More industry benchmarks, data matching, and cash economy audits
The Commissioner also advised that the ATO will:
- work with more
industries to develop benchmarks (these benchmarks allow taxpayers to
compare their performance to the rest of their industry and check that
their tax records reflect their business
practices);
- increase
their data matching to more effectively identify and target people
who may have under-reported income or over-claimed expenses;
and
- undertake
more than 5,000 cash economy audits or reviews.
Resident minors' 2008/09 tax-free threshold
The increase
in the low-income tax offset to $1,200 in 2008/09 (from $750 in 2007/08) effectively
means that minors (i.e., persons under
the age of 18) can receive $2,666 tax-free in the
2008/09 year (e.g., distributions from discretionary trusts).
The table
below shows that, without the offset, once a minor's income exceeds $1,308, the
entire amount of 'unearned income' is taxed
at 45%. Note that this does not apply to some receipts,
e.g., salary and wages.
However,
applying the low-income tax offset of $1,200 means that no income tax
will be payable unless the minor's taxable income
exceeds $2,666, i.e., $1,200 divided by 0.45 =
$2,666.66
2008/09 Resident Minors' Rates of Tax
Unearned Income (Div.6AA)
Div.6AA Income
$
Tax payable
$
0 – 416 Nil
417 – 1,307 66% of excess over $416
1,308+ 45% of the entire amount
'In-house' computer software – four year effective
life
Editor:
The Government announced in the Budget that it would be increasing the period
over which taxpayers write off depreciable
in-house software for tax purposes from
2.5 years to 4 years.
Although
the legislation implementing this change has only recently become law,
the new effective life applies to software
that the taxpayer acquired under a contract
entered
into on or after 7:30 pm on 13 May 2008, or which the taxpayer
otherwise started
developing or holding on or after that time.
Expenditure
on 'in-house computer software' is a taxpayer's expenditure on acquiring, developing
or having someone else develop
computer software which is mainly used
by the taxpayer.
This
could include off-the-shelf software acquired for use by the taxpayer.
Expenditure
on 'in-house computer
software' will continue to be depreciated
on
a straight line basis. Self Managed Super Funds (SMSFs):
Investment rules
The
ATO has recently released two
rulings, which consider
some of
the important investment rules
that set out how the ATO expects
SMSF trustees
will
use superannuation money.
Editor:
Because the superannuation
laws allow for very concessional
tax treatment
of money invested in a superannuation
environment, there are very
strict rules about what trustees
can and can't do.
Two of these investment rules
are:
- The
'sole purpose test' (i.e.,
basically, the SMSF must
be run solely to provide benefits
on members retirement
or death); and
- The
prohibition on SMSFs using
fund resources to provide
financial assistance to a
member, or a relative of
a member.
The
rulings provide a number of
examples regarding
these two investment
rules,
three of which are reproduced
below.
Example
1 – Separately negotiated
benefit: more than an incidental
benefit An SMSF trustee invests
in a non-related company that
owns a block of
holiday apartments at a popular
tourist destination
The
members of the SMSF holiday
in this area
every year and
prior to
making the investment
owned a separate holiday
house nearby.
The
trustee, when undertaking the
investment, negotiated
for members
of the SMSF
to be able to stay
at the apartments
for
free.
This is not a standard
feature
of the investment.
In
return, the SMSF was required
to accept
a
reduction in
dividends payable
by the company.
The
members of the SMSF sell
their holiday
house
immediately
after
the SMSF makes the
holiday apartment investment.
The
separate negotiation
of the benefit,
which materially
affects
the return
on the SMSF's
investment, demonstrates
that the
benefit is
purposeful
and not
incidental.
The
facts reveal
that the SMSF
is being
maintained
for a purpose
of
providing
benefits other
than those specified
by
the superannuation
law and,
therefore,
indicate
a contravention
of the
sole purpose
test.
Example
2 – Selling
an asset for less than
market value
Robert
is
a trustee
and
member
of
an
SMSF. The SMSF's
portfolio
of
assets
includes a block
of land located in an
inner city
suburb where
land
values have risen
significantly
in recent years.
Robert
sells the asset to
his son
for $210,000.
Two months
prior to
the sale, the
block of land
was
independently
valued
at
$300,000.
The
sale of
the land
by Robert
to his
son for
less than
market value
contravenes the prohibition
on SMSFs
providing financial
assistance to
a relative
of a
member (Editor:
And probably
the sole
purpose test,
as well).
Example
3 – Purchase
of an asset by an SMSF
for greater than market
value
Andrew
is a
member and
trustee of
an SMSF.
Andrew needs
to raise
$100,000 for personal
reasons.
He
owns a
block of
land that
qualifies as
business real
property and
has been independently
appraised as
having a
market value
of $80,000.
As
trustee of
the SMSF,
Andrew agrees
for the
SMSF to
purchase the
land for $100,000.
The
purchase of
the land
by Andrew
as trustee
of the
SMSF for
greater than
its market value
is the
giving of
financial assistance
to himself
(a member)
and therefore contravenes
the superannuation
law.
Please
Note: Many of the comments
in this publication are
general in nature and anyone
intending to apply the
information to practical
circumstances
should seek professional advice to independently verify their interpretation
and the information’s applicability to their particular circumstances.
|